000			01458cam a2200241 4500
001			ABS66803
008			030702n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u122900
100			_aBingham, T.
245			_aWhizz-bang walloped
260			_c2003
490			_aBuilding _v268(8288) 20 June 2003, 54-55(2)
520			_aDiscusses the implication for adjudication and arbitrators in "Badderley and another v Barker" ([2003] EWCA Civ 742, unreported). Here a nuisance claim was originally dismissed by the use of documents only. Argues that it may sometimes be unfair to conduct a case in this way as the adjudicator needs to 'see, hear and feel' the answers to awkward questions. Concludes by stating that the answer may well be to stop bringing big cases to adjudication unless an adjudicator can be found who is fair. View judgment at www.bailii.org.
590			_aABS
650			_aBADDELEY AND ANOTHER V BARKER
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
650			_aFLOOD DAMAGE
650			_aDOCUMENTS ONLY ARBITRATIONS
690			_aDispute resolution _96236
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2003/742.html _vView the judgment on the BAILII website...
942			_n0
999			_c72988 _d72988