| 000 | 01010cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS66930 | ||
| 008 | 030723n2003 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u123098 | ||
| 100 | _aMurdoch, S. | ||
| 245 | _aDoubt over the benefit | ||
| 260 | _c2003 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0327) 5 July 2003, 136(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses "Dano Ltd v Earl Cadogan and others"([2003] EWHC 239 (Ch), [2003] 12 EG 128 (CS)) challenging the enforceability of a restrictive covenant restricting land for use of working classes. HC held that a restrictive covenant cannot be enforced if benefited land no longer exists. Discusses the meaning of the term 'working classes' in a modern context. The HC decision has been upheld on appeal by the CA ([2003] EWCA Civ 782, Abs...). | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aCADOGAN ESTATE | ||
| 650 | _aDANO LTD V EARL CADOGAN AND OTHERS | ||
| 650 | _aWORKING CLASS HOUSING | ||
| 650 | _aRESTRICTIVE COVENANTS | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY AND LAND LAW-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c73098 _d73098 |
||