000			01783cam a2200217 4500
001			ABS66931
008			111219e2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u123193
245			_aStretch v United Kingdom
260			_c2003
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2003] 29 EG 118 (CS)
520			_aECHR Application No 44277/98, 24 June 2003. Landlord (W) refused to allow applicant (S) to exercise his option to renew building lease on grounds that the grant was "ultra vires". The HC ruling dismissing S's application for a declaration that he was entitled to exercise the option was upheld by CA (X95638). HL refused S's petition to appeal further. S appealed to the ECHR alleging that he had been denied his right to peaceful enjoyment of his possession and that he had been deprived of his possessions contrary to the European Convention on Human Rights First Protocol Art 1. He also claimed damages for loss of rental income. Application allowed. S had a legitimate expectation of exercising the option to renew and W's action could be said to have frustrated S's legitimate expectation and therefore amounted to interference with the quiet enjoyment of his possessions. S awarded Ł31 000 for pecuniary damage, Ł5 000 for non-pecuniary damage and Ł45 000 for costs and expenses.
590			_aABS
650			_aSTRETCH V UNITED KINGDOM
650			_aCONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS FIRST PROTOCOL ART 1
650			_aPEACEFUL ENJOYMENT
650			_aHUMAN RIGHTS
690			_aPROPERTY AND LAND LAW-CASE LAW
856			_uhttps://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/search.asp?skin=hudoc-en _zView judgment (type 44277/98 in the Application Number box and click on search) free of charge at http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int
942			_n0
999			_c73164 _d73164