000			01693cam a2200313 4500
001			ABS66911
008			030806n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u123216
100			_aConnal, C.
245			_aCaledonian gap widens
260			_c2003
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0328) 12 July 2003, 112(1)
520			_aArticle discusses the north-south divide in the application of keep-open clauses in the case of "Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd v Argyll Stores (Holdings) Ltd" (CA, Abs57165) and "Highland and Universal Properties Ltd v Safeway Properties Ltd" (CSIH, [2000] 3 EGLR 110). Article highlights that specific performance of a lease was the usual solution against tenants trading in Scotland, but not in England, although the Scottish Courts have set a new benchmark of 'exceptional' loss.
590			_aABS
650			_aKEEP OPEN CLAUSES
650			_aCO-OPERATIVE INSURANCE SOCIETY LTD V ARGYLL STORES (HOLDINGS) LTD
650			_aHIGHLAND AND UNIVERSAL PROPERTIES LTD V SAFEWAY PROPERTIES LTD
650			_aLEASES
650			_aSPECIFIC PERFORMANCE
650			_aLOSS
650			_aOAK MALL GREENOCK LTD V MCDONALDS RESTAURANTS LTD
650			_aRETAIL PROPERTY
650			_aSCOTLAND
650			_aENGLAND
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES
856			_uhttps://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199798/ldjudgmt/jd970521/coop01.htm _zView "Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd v Argyll Stores (Holdings) Ltd" judgment on HL website...
856			_uhttps://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinions/051898.html _zView "Highland and Universal Properties Ltd v Safeway Properties Ltd" judgment on the Scottish Courts website...
942			_n0
999			_c73175 _d73175