| 000 | 01766cam a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS67001 | ||
| 008 | 030829n2003 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u123402 | ||
| 245 | _aMoreau v Howard de Walden Estates Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c2003 | ||
| 520 | _aLRA/2/2002, 30 April 2003. Appeal by the tenant (M) of a long leasehold house from the decision of a Leasehold Valuation Tribunal determining the price on enfranchisement under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s9(1C). Following M's request to purchase the property's freehold, the tribunal determined the enfranchisement price at £1 955 000 with the only improvements to be deducted from this agreed value to be those carried out by M after his purchase of the long lease in October 1995. M's principal ground for appeal was that, when the lease was granted, the property had not yet been completed and therefore both the necessary completion works and the later works after completion should be disregarded, thus arriving at an enfranchisement price of £1 527 381. "Held", appeal dismissed. The tribunal correctly determined that the property had been completed at the grant of lease and to disregard only the later works. M had to show that this decision was incorrect, which he failed to do. The tribunal's enfranchisement price was confirmed. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aROSEN V TRUSTEES OF THE CAMDEN CHARITIES | ||
| 650 | _aMOREAU V HOWARD DE WALDEN ESTATES LTD | ||
| 650 | _aLEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT | ||
| 650 | _aLEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 1967 S9(1)(C) | ||
| 650 | _aLEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 1967 S10(4) | ||
| 650 | _aGRANTING OF LEASES | ||
| 650 | _aTENANTS | ||
| 650 | _aIMPROVEMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aDISREGARDS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASEHOLD REFORM-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c73300 _d73300 |
||