000			01379cam a2200193 4500
001			X123484
008			030903n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u123484
245			_aLook here, my man
260			_c2003
490			_aBuilding _v268(8296) 15 August 2003, 44-45(2)
520			_aExamines the case of "Jewson Ltd v Kelly". J had supplied 12 electric boilers to K, who was an entrepreneur who entered into property. The Building Inspectorate found that the heating system in a project to convert an old convent school into a block of flats had to meet Standard Assessment Proceedure (SAP) standards. K gave this as the reason the flats were not selling and claimed from J. In the HC the judge concluded that K had known how and where he intended to use the boilers and had relied on what J had told him, but in the subsequent appeal to the CA, it was pointed out that K had not actually relied on J to select suitable boilers for him and he had access to advice of his own. Concludes that this is a complex topic as there is a tendancy to argue that the supplier of an item is providing the product and is then responsible for the performance of the item.
590			_aABS
650			_aJEWSONS LTD V KELLY
650			_aSTANDARD ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
650			_aSALE OF GOODS ACT 1979
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING PATHOLOGY
942			_n0
999			_c73343 _d73343