000			01773cam a2200241 4500
001			ABS66997
008			030903n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u123491
245			_aMarazzi and another v Global Grange Ltd
260			_c2003
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2003] 34 EG 59-66(8)
520			_a[2003] EWHC 3010 (Ch), 20 December 2002. Appellant landlord (G) appealed against a County Court decision concerning a dispute over G's refusal to grant a new tenancy to (M). G opposed the grant of a new tenancy in accordance with the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s30(1)(f). The County Court decided that: firstly G's plans to upgrade the property from a two star to a four star hotel amounted to demolition and reconstruction but would not affect the substantial part of the premises; and secondly, removal of existing and the insertion of new partitions did not amount to demolition and the proposed work on utility services did not amount to structural work. The key issue concerned the character of the physical work involved. G's reliance on Ground f failed as when considering the true character of the physical word, it was found that the proposed works did not amount to the 'substantial work of construction'. County Court decision upheld. (See also Abs66828 and "Ivory Grove Ltd v Global Grange Ltd" ([2003] EWHC 1409 (Ch), ABS66998)
590			_aABS
650			_aIVORY GROVE LTD V GLOBAL GRANGE LTD
650			_aMARAZZI AND ANOTHER V GLOBAL GRANGE LTD
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S30(1)(F)
650			_aHOTELS
650			_aSTRUCTURAL WORKS
650			_aDEMOLITION
650			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING MAINTENANCE AND REFURBISHMENT
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c73349 _d73349