000			01717cam a2200265 4500
001			ABS66998
008			030904n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u123505
245			_aIvory Grove Ltd v Global Grange Ltd
260			_c2003
490			_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v[2003] 26 EG 179 (CS) (1)
490			_aWeekly Law Reports _v[2003] 1 WLR 2090-2108(19)
520			_a[2003] EWHC 1409 (Ch), 18 June 2003. Respondent landlord (G) refused tenant I's application for a new tenancy under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s30(1)(f) on the basis that it was intending to carry out substantial building works to refurbish the premises in order to bring them up to a three or four crown standard in accordance with guidelines issued by the English Tourist Board. I claimed that the proposed works came within the category of general refurbishment and did not constitute demolition or reconstruction for the purposes of s30(1)(f) of the Act. County Court found for G. I appealed. HC upheld the County Court decision. View judgment at www.bailii.org. (See also "Marazzi and another v Global Grange Ltd" ([2003] EWHC 3010 (Ch), Abs66997) and Abs66828).
590			_aABS
650			_aIVORY GROVE LTD V GLOBAL GRANGE LTD
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S30(1)(F)
650			_aMARAZZI AND ANOTHER V GLOBAL GRANGE LTD
650			_aSTRUCTURAL WORKS
650			_aHOTELS
650			_aDEMOLITION
650			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING MAINTENANCE AND REFURBISHMENT
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-CASE LAW
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2003/1409.html _zView judgment on the BAILII website...
942			_n0
999			_c73360 _d73360