000			01397cam a2200205 4500
001			ABS67061
008			030909n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u123509
245			_aDunnett v Railtrack plc (in railway administration)
260			_c2003
490			_aAll England Law Reports _v[2002] 2 All ER 850-853(4)
520			_a[2002] EWCA Civ 303, 22 February 2002. Whilst claimant D was granted permission to appeal to the CA against the dismissal of her claim for damages against defendant R, she was recommended to consider the possibility of alternative dispute resolution in accordance with Civil Procedure Rules 1.4. D was willing to explore the possibility of settling the dispute by alternative dispute resolution, but R rejected the idea. R offered to pay D a sum to settle her claim which D rejected as she did not consider the sum offered to be reasonable or fair. D lost her appeal, R sought its costs referring to the offers it had made. Taking into account R's refusal to consider alternative dispute resolution, the CA gave no order as to costs. (See also Abs66423, X118533, X118601 and X118619)
590			_aABS
650			_aCOSTS
650			_aDUNNETT V RAILTRACK PLC
650			_aALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
650			_aMEDIATION
690			_aMANGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION
942			_n0
999			_c73363 _d73363