000			01877cam a2200349 4500
001			ABS67085
008			030930n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u123762
100			_aPrice, G.
245		2	_aA conservative take on housing law
260			_c2003
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0333) 16 August 2003, 60-61(2)
520			_aOutlines, in the first of two "Mainly for students" articles, the position of claimants who seek redress against local authority landlords by relying on the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA). Indicates that three years on the HRA has not achieved the results in the field of housing law hoped for by some claimants and that the courts have acted conservatively, deferring to the views of parliament when applying Convention rights in this area of the law. Looks at the application of the HRA in housing law and leading cases involving the breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment, design defects and non-secure tenants in public sector housing. Provides a nutshell summary of some key aspects of the HRA. (See also Abs67086)
590			_aABS
650			_aLANDLORDS
650			_aCONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS ART 8
650			_aCONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS ART 8(2)
650			_aHOUSING ACT 1996 PART VII
650			_aENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT 1990 S79(1)(A)
650			_aHOUSING LAW
650			_aDENNIS V MINISTRY OF DEFENCE
650			_aGHAIDAN V GODIN-MENDOZA
650			_aLEE V LEEDS CITY COUNCIL
650			_aRATCLIFFE V SANDWELL MBC
650			_aSOUTHWARK LBC V MILLS
650			_aQUICK V TAFF ELY BC
650			_aSHEFFIELD CITY COUNCIL V SMART
650			_aHUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 S6
650			_aHUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c73490 _d73490