| 000 | 01558cam a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X123854 | ||
| 008 | 031006n2003 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u123854 | ||
| 245 | _aHOK Sport (formerly Lobb Partnership Ltd) and Aintree Racecourse Co Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c2003 | ||
| 490 |
_aConstruction Law Reports _v[2003] 86 Con LR 165-196(32) |
||
| 520 | _a[2003] EWHC 3094 (TCC), 12 November 2002. Application by appellant (L) for leave to appeal on a question of law arising out of an arbitrator's award pursuant to the Arbitration Act 1996 s69(2)(b). After considering application L was granted leave to appeal on the question of what basis should quantum of damages recoverable by A as a consequence of H's breaches of its duty to warn A be determined? HC held that the arbitrator should have applied "South Australia Asset Management Co v York Montague Ltd" [1997] AC 191. test in determining basis for liability. It was essential to identify the correct description of the kind of loss for which A was entitled to compensation and this was closely related to the precise scope and purpose of the duty owed to the A by H. H's duty was to provide information and not advice. Arbitrator's award amended on appeal, outlines revised basis for determining quantum of damages. | ||
| 650 | _aHOK SPORT (FORMERLY LOBB PARTNERSHIP LTD V AINTREE RACECOURSE | ||
| 650 | _aDAMAGES | ||
| 650 | _aDUTY OF CARE | ||
| 650 | _aARCHITECTS | ||
| 690 | _aMANGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c73559 _d73559 |
||