000			01454cam a2200253 4500
001			ABS67184
008			031010n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u123896
100			_aHarper, J.
245		2	_aA wise decision? When are building operations 'substantially completed'?
260			_c2003
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _vOctober 2003, 1226-1233(8)
520			_aCriticises the HL decision in "Sage v SoS and Others" [2003] UKHL 22, [2003] 1 WLR 983 with regards to the interpretation of the Town and Country Planning Act s171(B) (as amended). The HL in overturning the HC [2000] EGCS 112 and CA [2001] EWCA Civ 100, [2002] 1 P&CR 493 upheld the Inspector's decision that as the building for which an enforcement notice had been served was in the course of construction, s171(B) did not apply in this instance. S171(B) only applied where a building had been substantially completed. Looks at the construction of s171(B) in some depth and the relevance of a 'substantially 'completed' building. Analyses the HL decision and the reasoning behind it.
590			_aABS
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S171(B)
650			_aSUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETED
650			_aENFORCEMENT NOTICES
650			_aTIME LIMITS
650			_aPLANNING CONTROL
650			_aSAGE V SOS ENVIRONMENT AND OTHERS
650			_aBUILDING OPERATIONS
690			_aPlanning and development _96259
942			_n0
999			_c73587 _d73587