000			01539cam a2200301 4500
001			ABS67152
008			031030n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u124182
100			_aSheridan, P.
245			_aConstruction act review
260			_c2003
490			_aConstruction Law Journal _v19(6) 2003, 319-338(20)
520			_aUses a variety of cases to illustrate the meaning of the word 'dispute' in the context of adjudication, for the purposes of s108 of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996. Examines the case law which has developed since the passing of the Act. Concludes that the adjudication process sometimes results in disputes being taken to adjudication rather than being resolved by negotiation.
590			_aABS
650			_aHOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996 S108
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
650			_aNEGOTIATION
650			_aHALKI SHIPPING CORPORATION V SOPEX OILS LTD
650			_aFASTRACK CONTRACTORS LTD V MORRISON CONSTRUCTION
650			_aSINDALL LTD V SOLLAND
650			_aWATKIN JONES AND SON LTD V LIDL UK GMBH
650			_aCOSTAIN LTD V WESCOL STEEL LTD
650			_aBECK PEPPIATT LTD V NORWEST HOLST CONSTRUCTION LTD
650			_aORANGE E B S LTD V A B B LTD
690			_aMANGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION
700			_aHelps, D.
942			_n0
999			_c73715 _d73715