000			01932cam a2200277 4500
001			ABS67284
008			031118n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u124367
100			_aRoberts, N.
245			_aService charges,"Daejan" and claims in restitution
260			_c2003
490			_aConveyancer and Property Lawyer _v(67) September/October 2003, 380-397(18)
520			_aAfter considering the background in statutory provision and case law to service charge disputes, thisarticle attempts to explore the interface between service charge disputes and claims for repayment under the law of restitution. Makes extensive reference to "R v London LVT ex p Daejan Properties Ltd" (CA, Abs64698) which was concerned with the jurisdiction of Leasehold Valuation Tribunals. The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s27A later the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act s155 defines the jurisdiction of the Leasehold Valuation Tribunals with regards to service charge disputes. Considers "Nurdin and Peacock plc v D B Ramsden and Co Ltd" (ChD, Abs60331) in connection with the law of restitution pre and post "Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Lincoln City Council"(HL, Abs60152). Discusses statutory restitution with regards to the Rent Act 1977. Concludes with comments on the current position post-enactment of s27A of the 1985 Act and questions whether a leasehold valuation tribunal can order a payment in restitution.
590			_aABS
650			_aSERVICE CHARGES
650			_aRESTITUTION
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1985
650			_aCOMMONHOLD AND LEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 2002
650			_aR V LONDON LVT EX P DAEJAN PROPERTIES LTD
650			_aNURDIN AND PEACOCK PLC V D B RAMSDEN AND CO LTD
650			_aKLEINWORT BENSON LTD V LINCOLN CITY COUNCIL AND OTHERS
650			_aSTATUTORY RESTITUTION
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1985 S27A
690			_aPROPERTY AND LAND LAW-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c73805 _d73805