000			01674cam a2200217 4500
008			031124n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u124441
245			_aRobert Fidler v First SoS and Reigate and Banstead BC
260			_c2003
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v[2004] JPL 630-653(24)
520			_a[2003] EWHC 2003 (Admin), 1 October 2003. Appellant landowner (F) appealed under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s289 from a planning inspector's decision upholding enforcement notices. F also made an application under s288 of the Act challenging the inspector's decision in which he found against F on his application for a certificate of lawful development. The inspector quashed enforcement notices B-G in his preliminary findings but upheld A and I notices. He also refused to allow application for certificate of lawful development. "Held", on appeal that the inspector had erred in holding that notice I was valid within s171B(4)(b), upheld the inspector's rejection of the appeal against notice and approached the material change of use correctly. The decision to reject F's application for a certificate of lawful development was upheld. Appeal allowed in part. View judgment at www.bailii.org.
590			_aABS
650			_aFIDLER V FIRST SOS AND ANOTHER
650			_aENFORCEMENT NOTICES
650			_aCERTIFICATE OF LAWFUL USE
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S288
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S289
690			_aPlanning and development _96259
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2003/2003.html _zView judgment on the BAILII website...
942			_n0
999			_c73838 _d73838