| 000 | 01068cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS67267 | ||
| 008 | 031128n2003 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u124513 | ||
| 100 | _aMurdoch, S. | ||
| 245 | 2 | _aA more satisfactory outcome | |
| 260 | _c2003 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0346) 15 November 2003, 129(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses "Canary Wharf Investments v Telegraph Group Ltd" ([2003] EWHC 1575 (Ch), Abs67266) in which it was held that a hypothetical lease subject to a grant of 25 years without any express provision as to its start date must be construed as commencing on its review date. This decision has important implications as it reverses previous case law where it was held that the hypothetical leases should start on the same date as the action lease as directed. (See also Abs67044). | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aCANARY WHARF INVESTMENTS V TELEGRAPH GROUP LTD | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEWS | ||
| 650 | _aHYPOTHETICAL LEASES | ||
| 650 | _a25 YEAR LEASE | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RENT REVIEWS-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c73890 _d73890 |
||