| 000 | 01329cam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS67368 | ||
| 008 | 031203n2003 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u124554 | ||
| 100 | _aDanskin, D. | ||
| 245 | _aOverly complex? | ||
| 260 | _c2003 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0347) 22 November 2003, 150-151(2) |
||
| 520 | _aDefines the term overage with examples. Highlights problems which can occur with overage provisions in the development process with reference to recent case law. "Akasuc Enterprise v Farmar and Shirreff" ([2003] EWHC 1275 (Ch), [2003] PLSCS 127) demonstrates what can happen with poor security arrangements; "Bride Hall Estates Ltd v St George North London Ltd'' ([2003] EWHC 927 (Ch), [2003] PLSCS 105) deals with supplemental agreements whilst "MoD v County and Metropolitan Homes (Rissington) Ltd" ([2002] EWHC 2113 (Ch), [2002] 44 EG 170 (CS)) shows how important it is to keep on top of paperwork. Stresses the importance of clarity in the working of overage provisions. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aOVERAGE PAYMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aAKASUC ENTERPRISE LTD V FARMAR AND SHIRREFF | ||
| 650 | _aBRIDE HALL ESTATES LTD V ST GEORGE NORTH LONDON | ||
| 650 | _aMOD V COUNTRY AND METROPOLITAN HOMES (RISSINGTON) LTD | ||
| 650 | _aDEVELOPMENT PROCESS | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c73917 _d73917 |
||