| 000 | 01428cam a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS67360 | ||
| 008 | 031219n2003 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u124653 | ||
| 245 | _aLloyd Jones and others v T-Mobile (UK) Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c2003 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Law Reports _v[2003] 49 EG 130, 130-135(6) |
||
| 520 | _a[2003] EWCA Civ 1162, 31 July 2003. The defendent telecommunications company (T) had fixed a notice under the Telecommunications Act 1984 Sched 2 para 18, on their apparatus for potential objecters on completion of their tower to support mobile telephone antennae. The claimants (L) were adjacent property owners and occupiers who applied to have the tower removed under the Telecommunications Act 1984 para 17(2). At the preliminary trial, the judge decided that because the para 18 notice was not reasonably egible, the three month time limit had not begun to run. T appealed. "Held", the appeal was allowed. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aTELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT 1984 | ||
| 650 | _aLLOYD JONES AND OTHERS V T-MOBILE (UK) LTD | ||
| 650 | _aTIME LIMITS | ||
| 650 | _aACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT 1999 | ||
| 650 | _aNOTICES | ||
| 650 | _aMOBILE PHONE MASTS | ||
| 650 | _aANTENNAE | ||
| 650 | _aCIVIL PROCEDURE RULES 1998 | ||
| 650 | _aTELECOMMUNICATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PERMISSION | ||
| 690 | _aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c73975 _d73975 |
||