| 000 | 01421cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS67379 | ||
| 008 | 031223n2003 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u124693 | ||
| 245 | _aO'Brien v Harwood (VO) | ||
| 260 | _c2003 | ||
| 490 |
_aRating and Valuation Reporter _v[2003] RVR 319-320(2) |
||
| 520 | _a[2003] EWCA Civ 1375, 22 August 2003. Appellant ratepayer (O) sought permission to appeal against LT decision (RA/22/2002, Abs67201) which determined the rateable value of a hereditament consisting of a right under license to display advertisements on the flank wall of a warehouse building. "Held": that LT had approached its decision correctly by applying the correct legal principles and had taken great care in its examination of the evidence before it, particularly in the consideration of comparables. The LT had correctly rejected O's argument that liability for rates should be measured by ability to pay and emphasised the principle of equality of rating. O's argument that profits method of valuation should be used was also rejected. Permission to appeal refused. LT decision upheld. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aO'BRIEN V HARWOOD (VO) | ||
| 650 | _aRATEABLE VALUE | ||
| 650 | _aADVERTISING HOARDINGS | ||
| 650 | _aPROFITS METHOD | ||
| 650 |
_aValuation _96273 |
||
| 650 | _aCOMPARABLES | ||
| 650 | _aRATING APPEALS | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND LOCAL TAXATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c74002 _d74002 |
||