000			01939cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS67331
008			040108n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u124777
245			_aDean and Dyball Construction Ltd v Kenneth Grubb Associates Ltd
260			_c2003
490			_aConstruction Industry Law Letter _v[2003] CILL 2045-2049(5)
520			_a[2003] EWHC 2465 (TCC), 28 October 2003. Claimant (D) brought proceedings to enforce an adjudicator's award with interest from defendant (G). G opposed the application on the grounds that i) the dispute referred to the adjudicator was not the same as the claim made by D to G, ii) the contract between the parties was not capable of being adjudicated because it was not in writing as required by the Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 s107, iii) the dispute was not validly referred for adjudication under the contractual provisions, iv) the adjudicator made an error of law by answering the wrong question and v) the procedure lacked fairness. "Held" that G had no grounds for resisting the enforcement of the award as the construction contract contained provisions for adjudication and the dispute had been validly dealt with. Judgment found in favour of D. View judgment at www.bailii.org.
590			_aABS
650			_aDEAN AND DYBALL CONSTRUCTION LTD V KENNETH GRUBB ASSOCIATES LTD
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATION AWARDS
650			_aCONSTRUCTION DISPUTES
650			_aENFORCEMENT
650			_aNATURAL JUSTICE
650			_aHOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
690			_aMANGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2003/2465.html _zView judgment on the BAILII website...
942			_n0
999			_c74054 _d74054