000			01999cab a2200325 4500
001			ABS67460
008			040119n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u124867
100			_aLewsley, C.
245			_aRecent cases - do they clarify or confuse?
260			_c2003
490			_aRating and Valuation Reporter _v43(12) December 2003, 347-352(6)
520			_aConsiders the role of case reports in rating and valuation law. The author argues that in rating and valuation law, case law fulfils two roles, firstly the interpretation and application of the meaning of the legislation and secondly the establishment of a framework and foundation for principles of valuation for rating. Refers to three recent cases "Martin and others v Hewitt (VO)" (RA/3-7/2001, Abs67288) concerned with the definition of domestic property in the Local Government Finance Act 1988 s66, "Tully v Jorgensen (VO)" (RA/22/2001, Abs67200) which look at the interpretation of Local Government Finance Act 1988 s66(1) in relation to home working and "Ebury (VO)" (RA/1/2003, [2003] RA 261) which looked at the Non Domestic Rating (Alteration of Lists and Appeals) Regulations 1993. These cases illustrates the interpretative role of case law. "O'Brien v Harwood (VO)" (RA/22/2002, Abs67201) illustrates the framework role of case law by laying down guidance on the principle of uniformity and the principle on the ability of pay.
590			_aABS
650			_aLAW REPORTS
650			_aMARTIN AND OTHERS V HEWITT (VO)
650			_aTULLY V JORGENSEN (VO)
650			_aEBURY (VO)
650			_aO'BRIEN V HARWOOD (VO)
650			_aRATING VALUATION
650			_aVALUATION METHODS
650			_aTONE OF THE LIST
650			_aHOME WORKING
650			_aRATING ASSESSMENT
650			_aLOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE ACT 1988 S66
650			_aNON DOMESTIC RATING (ALTERATION OF LISTS AND APPEALS) REGULATIONS 1993
650			_aCURTILAGE
690			_aRATING AND LOCAL TAXATION
942			_n0
999			_c74062 _d74062