000			01626cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS67436
008			040203n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u124996
245			_aBurford UK Properties Ltd and Others v Forte Hotels (UK) Ltd (Formerly Trust House Forte) and Others
260			_c2003
520			_a[2003] EWCA Civ 1800, 17 December 2003. The claimant landlord (B) appealed against a decision on the interpretation of the rent review provisions in a 99-year lease of a hotel in York. The lease provided for a rent review every 14 years, with the reviewed rent to be fixed by reference to Net Bedroom Revenue (NBR). NBR was to be accounted subject to the proviso that the tenant should use its best endeavours to obtain the maximum revenue from the use of bedrooms as sleeping accommodation. The judge held that this did not constitute a covenant by the tenant, holding that NBR was to be calculated on the hypothesis that the tenant had used its best endeavours to obtain the maximum revenue from the use of the bedrooms. B appealed. "Held" the appeal was dismissed as the judge's conclusion had been correct. View at www.courtservice.gov.uk.
590			_aABS
650			_aLEASES
650			_aRENT REVIEW PROVISIONS
650			_aHOTELS
650			_aBREACH OF COVENANT
650			_aBURFORD UK PROPERTIES LTD AND OTHERS V FORTE HOTELS (UK) LTD (FORMERLY TRUST HOUSE FORTE) AND OTHERS
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-CASE LAW
856			_uhttps://www.courtservice.gov.uk/judgmentsfiles/j2167/burford.htm _zView judgment on the Court Service website...
942			_n0
999			_c74105 _d74105