| 000 | 01166cab a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS67536 | ||
| 008 | 040218n2004 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u125192 | ||
| 100 | _aBailey, J. | ||
| 245 | _aWhat are best endeavours? | ||
| 260 | _c2004 | ||
| 490 |
_aInternational Construction Law Review _v21(1) January 2004, 57-66(10) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders the purpose of best endeavour clauses in contracts. It suggests that their purpose is not to impose an obligation to achieve a particular objective but requires the parties involved to do their best towards achieving it. Examines the use of such clauses in the construction and planning context and provides a useful summary on their use and meaning. Refers extensively to case law. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aBEST ENDEAVOUR | ||
| 650 | _aLAW OF CONTRACT | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING LAW | ||
| 650 | _aOBLIGATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aSHEFFIELD DISTRICT RAILWAYS V GREAT CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY | ||
| 650 | _aTERRELL V MABIE TODD AND CO | ||
| 650 | _aRACKHAM V PEEK FOODS LTD | ||
| 650 | _aDAMAGES | ||
| 690 | _aLAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c74157 _d74157 |
||