| 000 | 01339cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS67525 | ||
| 008 | 040301n2004 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u125263 | ||
| 100 | _aMurdoch, Sandi | ||
| 245 | 4 | _aThe service game | |
| 260 | _c2004 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0403) 17 January 2004, 99(1) |
||
| 520 | _aExamines the problem of serving notices between landlord and tenant, particularly where strict time limits apply. Notices under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927 s23 can be served by sending them by recorded delivery. If sent by recorded delivery, then service is deemed to take effect when the notice is posted, not when it is received. Refers to case law, particularly "C A Webber (Transport) Ltd v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd" ([2003] EWCA Civ 1167, [2004] 1WLR 320) which supports the use of the date sent, not the date received, as the date that a notice is served. However, this is felt to be unfair, as it allows a notice to be served at a time when the server knows that it cannot be received until after the designated time limit. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aNOTICES | ||
| 650 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1927 S23 | ||
| 650 | _aC A WEBBER (TRANSPORT) LTD V NETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LTD | ||
| 650 | _aTIME LIMITS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c74189 _d74189 |
||