000			01832cab a2200229 4500
001			ABS67479
008			040304n2004 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u125333
245			_aPilkington United Kingdom Limited v CGU Insurance plc
260			_c2004
490			_aBuilding Law Reports _v[2004] BLR 97-110(14)
520			_a[2004] EWCA Civ 23, 28 January 2004. The Tarmac Group (T) had installed glass panels, manufactured by Pilkington (P), in the roof and vertical panelling of the Eurostar (E) terminal at Waterloo Station. A small number then fractured in-situ, causing no personal injury or damage to the fabric of the terminal. E, anxious about future injuries, temporarily closed the terminal, commissioned a technical investigation and installed safety features under the panels. In February 2000 E commenced proceedings against T, who served a Part 20 claim on P claiming indemnity. P notified C G U (C) who rejected claim as falling outside policy cover. The dispute was settled by mediation and P contributed to the overall settlement but commenced proceedings against C to recover its contribution plus costs. P claimed the terminal was physically damaged by the installation of defective panels and the public was at future risk. "Held": the appeal was dismissed on the grounds that a defect or deterioration in a thing is not necessarily damage in itself. View judgment at www.courtservice.gov.uk.
590			_aABS
650			_aPILKINGTON UK LTD V C G U INSURANCE PLC
650			_aMEDIATION
650			_aCLADDING
650			_aINSURANCE CLAIMS
650			_aCONSTRUCTION DISPUTES
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING PATHOLOGY
856			_uhttps://www.courtservice.gov.uk/judgmentsfiles/j2237/pilkington-v-cgu_insurance.htm _zView judgment on the Court Service website...
942			_n0
999			_c74239 _d74239