000			01411cab a2200229 4500
001			ABS67477
008			040304n2004 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u125342
100			_aBingham, T.
245			_aStakes and ladders
260			_c2004
490			_aBuilding _v269(8319) 13 February 2004, 48-49(2)
520			_aTells of a dispute between "IDE Contracting Ltd v RG Carter Cambridge" (TCC),[2004] BLR 172-178(7). IDE, a subcontractor began an adjudication for unpaid sums and issued a standard notice of adjudication. RG argued that the rules in The Scheme for Construction Contracts (SCE) had laid out an established procedure for finding a substitute adjudicator and this had not been followed. When the result of the adjudication were issued and a £120 147 award announced, RG refused to pay and IDE sought to enforce it in the HC and lost. Concluded that the SCE needs to be followed very precisely even if this goes against the common sense of the two parties.
590			_aABS
650			_aIDE CONTRACTING LTD V RG CARTER CAMBRIDGE
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
650			_aUNPAID FEES
650			_aSCHEME FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS
650			_aCHARTERED INSTITUTE OF ARBITRATORS
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
942			_n0
999			_c74245 _d74245