| 000 | 01401cab a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS67566 | ||
| 008 | 040305n2004 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u125344 | ||
| 100 | _aKehinde, B. | ||
| 245 | _aStrategies for fiscal strength | ||
| 260 | _c2004 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0404) 24 January 2004, 100-102(3) |
||
| 520 | _aExamines the arguments whether tax efficiency for property investors may be achieved through forming a limited liability property investment company. Looks at the relative advantages of corporate and private ownership, how to minimise Corporation Tax and the Capital Gains Tax implications when investors have to account for rental income. Concludes that companies used for rental investment are marginally advantageous when looking at income, are particularly useful, from an income perspective, if the investor reinvests the profits for further purchases and companies may be better vehicles for property trading and development. Table showing the five rates of Corporation Tax. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aSTAMP DUTY LAND TAX | ||
| 650 | _aSTAMP DUTY | ||
| 650 | _aRENTAL INCOME | ||
| 650 | _aPROPERTY INVESTMENT COMPANIES | ||
| 650 | _aLIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES | ||
| 650 | _aCORPORATION TAX | ||
| 650 | _aCAPITAL GAINS TAX | ||
| 650 | _aPROPERTY INVESTMENT | ||
| 650 | _aTAX EFFICIENCY | ||
| 690 | _aTAXATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c74247 _d74247 |
||