000			01316cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS67639
008			040309n2004 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u125380
245			_aBolton MBC v Torkington
260			_c2004
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2004] 07 EG 132-139(8)
520			_a[2003] EWCA Civ 1634, 31 October 2003. Appeal by defendant (T) against HC decision granting claimant council (B) possession of property owned by it and occupied by T. B had instigated possession proceedings after failing to agree lease terms with T. Concerned with the interpretation of the Law of Property Act 1925 s74(1) with regards to the delivery and sealing of a deed. "Held": s74(1) was not concerned with the delivery of a deed but with the effect of its sealing by a corporation. A lease sealed in negotiations conducted subject to contract prior to completion had not been delivered and therefore s74(1) did not apply. "Longman v Viscount Chelsea and others" (CA, Abs41712) applied. Appeal dismissed. HL refused leave to appeal.
590			_aABS
650			_aBOLTON MBC AND TORKINGTON
650			_aDEEDS
650			_aLONGMAN V VISCOUNT CHELSEA AND OTHERS
650			_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S74(1)
650			_aDELIVERY
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c74254 _d74254