| 000 | 00974cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS67640 | ||
| 008 | 040309n2004 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u125381 | ||
| 100 | _aMurdoch, S. | ||
| 245 | _aHonourable intentions | ||
| 260 | _c2004 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0409) 28 February 2004, 143(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses "Bolton MBC and Torkington" ([2003] EWCA Civ 1634, Abs...) which examines the legal effectiveness of a deed executed by a corporation. The sealing of a deed by a corporation does not in itself constitute delivery of the deed. Sealing may suggest that delivery has taken place but delivery turns on proof of the intention of the party executing the deed. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aBOLTON MBC AND TORKINGTON | ||
| 650 | _aDEEDS | ||
| 650 | _aLONGMAN V VISCOUNT CHELSEA AND OTHERS | ||
| 650 | _aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S74(1) | ||
| 650 | _aDELIVERY | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c74255 _d74255 |
||