000			01776cab a2200277 4500
001			ABS67642
008			040324n2004 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u125555
245			_aDesign Progression Ltd v Thurloe Properties Ltd
260			_c2004
490			_aProperty, Planning and Compensation Reports _v[2004] P&CR 594-624(26)184(1)(CS)
520			_a[2004] EWHC 324 (Ch) 25 February 2004. The claimant tenant (D) sought damages from the defendant landlord (T) for breach of statutory duty to give any decision to assign the remainder of its lease, within the reasonable time imposed on (T) under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1988 s1(3). When D made an application to assign the remainder of the lease to a third party (H), the rent for the shop premises was significantly below the market rate. D and H duly submitted all the necessary information to T concerning the third party's financial circumstances. But T prevaricated which meant D and the H missed their deadline for completion in April 2002. H accordingly found other premises. "Held": the appeal was allowed as T had possessed all the necessary information by March 2002, and so had no reason to refuse the licence to assign. View judgment at www.bailii.gov.uk.
590			_aABS
650			_aDESIGN PROGRESSION LTD V THURLOE PROPERTIES LTD
650			_aEXEMPLARY DAMAGES
650			_aASSIGNMENT
650			_aBREACH OF STATUTORY DUTY
650			_aREASONABLE TIME
650			_aLICENCES TO ASSIGN
650			_aLOSS OF PROFITS
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1988 S1
650			_aCOMMERCIAL LEASES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-CASE LAW
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2004/324.html _zView judgment on the BAILII website...
942			_n0
999			_c74294 _d74294