000			01277cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS67574
008			040325n2004 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u125589
100			_aSydenham, A.
245			_aUse of private rights of way
260			_c2004
490			_aFarm Tax Brief _v19(1) February 2004, 7-8(2)
520			_aConsiders the use of private rights of way using case law and the issue of whether a right of way could be used to access a non-dominant tenement where the use of that land was ancillary to the use of the dominant tenement. Cases used to illustrate the inconsistent approach to this issue include "Peacock v Custins" (CA, Abs63791), "Das and others v Linden Mews Ltd" ([2002] EWCA Civ 590, Abs65673), "Massey and another v Boulden and another ([2002] EWCA Civ 1634, Abs66173) and "Macepark (Whittlebury) Ltd v Sargeant and another" [2003] EWHC 427(ch), Abs67212.
590			_aABS
650			_aRIGHTS OF WAY
650			_aDOMINANT TENEMENTS
650			_aPEACOCK V CUSTINS
650			_aMASSEY AND ANOTHER V BOULDEN AND ANOTHER
650			_aDAS AND OTHERS V LINDEN MEWS
650			_aMACEPARK (WHITTLEBURY) LTD V SARGEANT AND ANOTHER
690			_aBOUNDARIES, PARTY WALLS AND EASEMENTS-RIGHTS OF WAY-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c74302 _d74302