000			01645cab a2200253 4500
001			ABS67588
008			040401n2004 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u125715
100			_aBlackie, N.
245		4	_aThe significant part of a listed building
260			_c2004
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _vMarch 2004, 268-272(5)
520			_aConsiders in some depth the guidance and interpretation of PPG15 paras 3.15A and 3.19 given in "Sullivan v Warwick DC" ([2003] EWHC 606, [2003] JPL 1545) with regards to the partial demolition of a listed building for which a planning permission and listed building consent had been granted. Paras 3.15.A and 3.19 had been amended following "Shimizu (UK) Ltd v Westminster City Council" (HL, Abs56626). "Shimizu" held that demolition of a listed building in the context of the Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 involved the pulling down and removal of a whole building. Demolition of only part of a listed building was by contrast an alteration. Pays special attention given to the interpretation of paras 3.15A and 3.19 by English Heritage in its advice to Warwick DC who granted the consent for partial demolition.
590			_aABS
650			_aSULLIVAN V WARWICK DC
650			_aPLANNING PERMISSION
650			_aLISTED BUILDING CONSENT
650			_aSHIMIZU V WESTMINSTER CC
650			_aGRADE II LISTED BUILDINGS
650			_aPLANNING (LISTED BUILDING AND CONSERVATION AREAS) ACT 1990
650			_aENGLISH HERITAGE
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING MAINTENANCE AND REFURBISHMENT-BUILDING CONSERVATION
942			_n0
999			_c74343 _d74343