000			01369cab a2200253 4500
001			ABS67878
008			040525n2004 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u126290
100			_aMacrory, R.
245			_aHabitat protection and planning permissions
260			_c2004
490			_aENDS Report _v(351) April 2004, 56(1)
520			_aThe High Court has raised important questions about the viability of wildlife conservation measures introduced under the Conservation (Natural Habitats, Etc) Regulations 1994 in the light of existing permissions. In a case involving an old quarry, "4th Duke of Westminster's 1964 Settlement Trustees v Welsh Assembly" ([2004] EWHC 50 (Admin), [2004] 7 EG 130 (CS)), the court held that existing permissions could legitimise activities that might damage a designated habitat and that the Welsh Assembly had been wrong in rejecting this as a relevant factor when considering whether to grant a licence to disturb a habitat.
590			_aABS
650			_aCONSERVATION (NATURAL HABITATS, ETC.) REGULATIONS 1994
650			_aDIRECTIVE 92/43/EEC
650			_a4TH DUKE OF WESTMINSTER'S 1964 SETTLEMENT TRUSTEES V WELSH ASSEMBLY
650			_aQUARRYING
650			_aPLANNING PERMISSIONS
650			_aHABITAT PROTECTION
650			_aPLANNING APPLICATIONS
690			_aRURAL-NATURE CONSERVATION
942			_n0
999			_c74407 _d74407