000			01362cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS67827
008			040602n2004 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u126379
100			_aBingham, T.
245			_aHold up!
260			_c2004
490			_aBuilding _v269(8331) 7 May 2004, 50-51(2)
520			_aConsiders the issues raised by "Buxton Building Contractors Ltd v Durand Primary School" ([2004] EWHC 733 (TCC), [2004] ALL ER (D) 87 (Apr)). Argues that it gives a useful example of the reverse ambush effect in adjudication and considers whether the defendant's claim for damages, attached to its response to a formal adjudication notice requiring payment on an interim payment on an interim certificate, was an unfair ambush. The judge was concerned that the adjudicator had failed to consider all the evidence submitted about the cross claim and rules that the adjudicator only has jurisdiction to consider the evidence in the dispute which has been referred directly to him.
590			_aABS
650			_aBUXTON BUILDING CONTRACTORS V DURAND PRIMARY SCHOOL GOVERNORS
650			_aREVERSE AMBUSH
650			_aINTERIM CERTIFICATES
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
690			_aDispute resolution _96236
942			_n0
999			_c74418 _d74418