000			01548cam a2200205 4500
008			040622n2004 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u126560
100			_aThornton, A.
245		4	_aThe meddle dectector
260			_c2004
490			_aBuilding _v269(8336) 11 June 2004, 52-53(2)
520			_aExamines the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 which Sir Michael Latham is reviewing. Considers the Act a legislative triumph which has established a cheap and speedy dispute resolution system. Any changes to the Act which could alter the balance between tribunal autonomy and state intervention when an adjudicators' decision has been challenged should be drafted with care. The trend of cases under the Act has allowed adjudicators much leeway in setting the procedures to be followed so reform should only be contemplated if it would speed up enforcement. Also includes the suggestion that a revised Act could include a mechanism that controls and caps the fees charged by adjudicators
650			_aHOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
650			_aLATHAM REFORMS
650			_aPAYMENT PROCEDURES
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATION AWARDS
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATION AWARDS
690			_aDispute resolution _96236
942			_n0
999			_c74434 _d74434