000			01534cab a2200265 4500
001			ABS68012
008			040714n2004 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u126777
245			_aBridgestart Properties Ltd v London Underground Ltd
260			_c2004
490			_aRating and Valuation Reporter _v[2004] RVR 196-200(5)
520			_a[2004] EWCA Civ 793, 24 June 2004. Appeal against LT decision (ACQ/128/2002, Abs67610) which held that any action involving a claim for injurious affection brought under the Land Clauses Consolidation Act 1845 s63 was time-barred under the Limitation Act 1980. On appeal, B submitted that L was prevented from relying on the limitation point due to the existence of an estoppel by convention, equitable estoppel or waiver. After considering the evidence, CA held that no estoppel had been established which prevented L from relying on the limitation defence. LT decision upheld. Appeal dismissed. View judgment at www.bailii.org.
590			_aABS
650			_aBRIDGESTART PROPERTIES LTD V LONDON UNDERGROUND LTD
650			_aLAND CLAUSES CONSOLIDATION ACT 1845 S63
650			_aCOMPENSATION
650			_aTIME-BARRED
650			_aTUNNELLING
650			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT
650			_aLIMITATION ACT 1980 S9
650			_aESTOPPEL
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2004/793.html _zView judgment on the BAILII website...
942			_n0
999			_c74457 _d74457