000			01662cab a2200229 4500
001			ABS67985
008			040716n2004 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u126814
245			_aBath and North East Somerset District Council v Mowlem plc
260			_c2004
490			_aBuilding Law Reports _v[2004] BLR 153-162(10)
520			_a[2004] EWCA Civ 722, 20 February 2004. Bath (B) had contracted Mowlem (M) to carry out restoration works to its spa buildings. Completion was delayed and paintwork had caused problems. B instructed M to remove the paint, and when M refused, B gave notice to M that it would instruct another firm to do so and charge M. This firm was denied entry to the site by M. B sought an interim injunction aginst M. M argued that the liquidated damages provided what the parties had accepted as an adequate remedy. B asserted they would not be adequately compensated. This was granted. M appealed. "Held": the appeal was dismissed as the granting of an injunction would cause M no disadvantage; the judge's decision to grant the interlocutory injunction was upheld. View judgment at www.nadr.co.uk.
590			_aABS
650			_aLIQUIDATED DAMAGES
650			_aASCERTAINED DAMAGES
650			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS-STANDARD FORMS OF BUILDING CONTRACT-JOINT CONTRACTS TRIBNUAL CONTRACTS
650			_aINTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTIONS
650			_aBATH AND NORTH EAST SOMERSET DC V MOWLEM PLC
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
856			_uhttps://www.nadr.co.uk/articles/published/ConstructionLR/Bath%20v%20Mowlem%202004.pdf _zView judgment at www.nadr.co.uk....
942			_n0
999			_c74467 _d74467