| 000 | 01186cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS68443 | ||
| 008 | 041125n2004 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u128129 | ||
| 100 | _aHelps, D. | ||
| 245 | _aGarbage in, garbage out | ||
| 260 | _c2004 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v269(8356) 5 November 2004, 54(1) |
||
| 520 | _aExamines the problems in disputes involving responsibility for delay and the entitlement to extensions of time for completion. Notes how computer software has helped in these evaluations and how planning and programme experts have become central players in this type of dispute resolution. As "Skanska Construction UK Ltd v Egger (Barony) Ltd" (Civ 1919, [2002] 83 Con LR 132) shows a computer programme is only as useful as the data entered into it and is no substitute for the direct application of professional experience and objective judgment. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aSKANSKA CONSTRUCTION UK LTD V EGGER (BARONY) LTD | ||
| 650 | _aCOMPUTER SOFTWARE | ||
| 650 | _aEXTENSIONS OF TIME | ||
| 650 | _aDELAY ANALYSIS | ||
| 650 |
_aDISPUTE RESOLUTION _96236 |
||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-INFORMATION MANAGEMENT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c74630 _d74630 |
||