| 000 | 01974cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS68565 | ||
| 008 | 041213n2004 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u128285 | ||
| 245 | _aPhoebe St Leger-Davey and James Harrison v First Secretary of State and Winchester City Council and Orange PCS Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c2004 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty, Planning and Compensation Reports _v[2005] 2 P & CR 6, 86-96 (11) |
||
| 520 | _a[2004] EWCA Civ 1612, 1 December 2004. Appeal by LD and another against a HC decision ([2004] EWCA Civ 1612) refusing an application to quash a decision of an inspector appointed by the First SoS on 19 August 2003 following a public inquiry. The inspector had allowed an appeal by O against the refusal of Winchester City Council to grant prior approval for the siting and design of an 11.79m high telecommunications mast and an equipment cabin. The consideration for the basis of the appeal is whether the inspector took account of and correctly considered the effect of the code power granted by the statutory telecommunications code contained in the Telecommunications Act 1984 Sched 2. The availability of suitable alternative sites was also a key issue. Upheld the HC decision that the inspector after considering the relevant development policy, PPG8, the compulsory purchase powers available to telecommunication operators under the telecommunications code and possible alternative sites had reached the correct conclusion. Appeal dismissed. View judgment at www.bailii.org. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aST LEGER-DAVEY AND ANOTHER V FIRST SOS AND OTHERS | ||
| 650 | _aTELECOMMUNICATIONS CODE | ||
| 650 | _aTELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT 1984 SCHED 2 | ||
| 650 | _aMASTS | ||
| 650 | _aALTERNATIVE SITES | ||
| 650 | _aPPG8 | ||
| 650 | _aLOCAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS | ||
| 690 |
_aPlanning and development _96259 |
||
| 856 |
_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2004/1612.html _zView judgment on the BAILII websiteƯ |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c74665 _d74665 |
||