| 000 | 01604cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS68598 | ||
| 008 | 050125n2005 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u128606 | ||
| 100 | _aDodsworth, C. | ||
| 245 | _aCaught in possession | ||
| 260 | _c2005 | ||
| 490 |
_aConstruction News _v(6898) 7 January 2005, 22(1) |
||
| 520 | _aThere are three main types of possession that a contractor can take note of on a construction site and these can affect the level of liquidated damages risk it is exposed to if delays should occur on a project. The types of possession are exclusive possession, exclusive possession with use/occupation by the client and partial possession. The last two are treated differently and there are some recent examples including, "Impresa Castelli SPA v Cola Holdings Ltd ([2002] EWHC 1363 (TCC), [2002] CILL 1904)". Here, there was a dispute over damages and the judge had to decide if Cola had achieved partial possession of a site which, if proved, would have reduced the amount of damages payable by Impresa. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aSKANSKA CONSTRUCTION (REGIONS) LTD V ANGLO-AMSTERDAM CORPORATION LTD | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS-STANDARD FORMS OF BUILDING CONTRACT-JOINT CONTRACTS TRIBNUAL CONTRACTS | ||
| 650 | _aPRACTICAL COMPLETION | ||
| 650 | _aPARTIAL POSSESSION | ||
| 650 | _aEXCLUSIVE POSSESSION | ||
| 650 | _aLIQUIDATED DAMAGES | ||
| 650 | _aIMPRESA CASTELLI SPA V COLA HOLDINGS LTD | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c74752 _d74752 |
||