000			01430cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS68658
008			050126n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u128631
041			_aeng
245			_aSt George's Investment Co v Gemini Consulting Ltd
260			_c2005
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2005] 01 EG 96-101(6)
520			_a[2004] EWHC 2353 (Ch), 8 October 2004. Discussed whether a arbitrator's award should be reconsidered on the grounds that he had departed from the agreed basis upon which the case was put to him. S appealed for reconsideration under the Arbitration Act 1996 s68 argued that the discount for onerous lease terms the arbitrator had applied was not part of the submission and that, if it had been S would have argued that the terms had already been taken into consideration. "Held": the application was allowed and the award remitted to the arbitrator.
590			_aABS
650			_aST GEORGE'S INVESTMENT CO V GEMINI CONSULTING LTD
650			_aARBITRATION ACT 1996 S68
650			_aCHECKPOINT LTD V STRATHCLYDE PENSION FUND
650			_aWARBOROUGH INVESTMENTS LTD V ROBINSON AND SONS (HOLDINGS) LTD
650			_aZERMALT HOLDINGS SA V NU-LIFE UPHOLSTERY REPAIRS LTD
650			_aPACOL LTD V JOINT STOCK CO ROSSAKHAR
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION-ARBITRATION AWARDS
942			_n0
999			_c74767 _d74767