000			01166cab a2200217 4500
001			X128670
008			050128n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u128670
100			_aWinter, J.
245			_aWhen the chips are down
260			_c2005
490			_aConstruction News _v13 January 2005, 25(1)
520			_aExamines the long running dispute between Skanska and Egger over the construction of a chipboard factory in Scotland. Argues that the events of this dispute can form the basis of effective advice about future conduct in disputes about contracts. For example, in this case, the contract was not effective for the situation as it was a hybrid one which did not provide any incentives for the contractor. Also the need for mediation had been highlighted as the case was allowed to continue for a long time with many small claims making it very long and expensive to administer.
590			_aABS
650			_aSKANSKA CONSTRUCTION UK LTD V EGGER (BARONY) LTD
650			_aEXPERT WITNESSES
650			_aDESIGN AND BUILD CONTRACTS
650			_aInsurance _96249
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
942			_n0
999			_c74778 _d74778