000			02123cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS68751
008			050217n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u128818
041			_aeng
245			_aNorth British Housing Association Ltd v Matthews and related appeals; London and Quadrant Housing Ltd v Morgan
260			_c2005
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2005] 02 EG 101(CS)(1)
490			_aWeekly Law Reports _v[2005] 1 WLR 3133-3157(25)
520			_a[2004] EWCA Civ 1736, 21 December 2004. Discusses whether an adjournment can be granted after a mandatory ground for possession has been fulfilled. N brought possession proceedings against appellant tenants M, whose rent arrears had extended beyond eight weeks at the date notice was served and the date of the hearing, thereby fulfilling the mandatory ground for possession in the Housing Act 1988 Sched 2 Part I Ground 8. M applied for a hearing adjournment because maladministration by the local authority in paying their housing benefit had caused their inability to address the arrears in time. The adjournment was refused as subsection 6 of s9(1) disapplied the adjournment provision in s9 of the Act in those cases where the court was satisfied that the landlord was entitled to possession on any of the grounds in Sched 2 Part I including Ground 8. "Held": appeals dismissed. Once the court had expressed the conclusion that it was satisfied that the landlord was entitled to possession there was no power to grant an adjournment in any circumstances. The power to adjourn should not be exercised for the purpose of allowing a tenant to reduce arrears below the Ground 8 threshold save in exceptional circumstances. Arrears attributable to local authority maladminstration did not meet this criterion.
590			_aABS
650			_aNORTH BRITISH HOUSING ASSOCIATION LTD V MATTHEWS
650			_aHOUSING ACT 1988
690			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2004/1736.html _zView the judgment at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c74807 _d74807