000			01680cab a2200277 4500
001			ABS68690
008			050217n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u128821
041			_aeng
245			_aMidtown Ltd v City of London Real Property Co Ltd; Joseph and others v City of London Real Property Co Ltd
260			_c2005
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2005] 14 EG 130-141(12)
520			_a[2005] EWHC 33 (Ch), 20 January 2005. M claimed that a development by C significantly diminished the amount of light reaching M's office building. C also claimed that a 1930 conveyance meant it could override any right to light enjoyed by the area of land affected by that conveyance and that the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s237 applied and overrode any easement of light. "Held": the diminution of light was found to be a nuisance and interfered with the claimants right to light even though the offices were normally artificially lit when in use; C's claims dismissed.
590			_aABS
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990
650			_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925
650			_aSHELFER V CITY OF LONDON ELECTRIC LIGHTING CO
650			_aCOLLS V HOME & COLONIAL STORES 1904
650			_aJAGGARD V SAWYER AND ANOTHER
650			_aSTOCKPORT MBC V ALWIYAH DEVELOPMENTS
650			_aWROTHAM PARK SETTLED ESTATES V HERTSMERE BOROUGH COUNCIL
650			_aMIDTOWN LTD V CITY OF LONDON REAL PROPERTY CO LTD
690			_aPROPERTY-PROPERTY MANAGEMENT-EASEMENTS-RIGHTS TO LIGHT DETERMINATION-RIGHTS TO LIGHT
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2005/33.html _zView the item free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c74808 _d74808