| 000 | 01132cab a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS68693 | ||
| 008 | 050221n2005 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u128854 | ||
| 100 | _aCottam, G. | ||
| 245 | _aBut is it a contract? | ||
| 260 | _c2005 | ||
| 490 |
_aConstruction News _v(6903) 10 February 2005, 31(1) |
||
| 520 | _aStresses the importance for construction professionals for having a carefully worded contract before any work is started. If standard conditions are to be included in a contract the appendices must be completed. Illustrates this with reference to a recent case, "Bryen and Langley Ltd v Boston" ([2004] EWHC 2450 (TCC), Abs68430). Here a dispute arose over whether JCT conditions formed part of the contract, and this voided an adjudicator's decision that money was owed for a flat conversion that went well over the anticipated contract sum. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aBRYEN AND LANGLEY LTD V BOSTON | ||
| 650 | _aJCT 1998 PRIVATE WITH QUANTITIES | ||
| 650 | _aUNFAIR TERMS IN CONSUMER CONTRACTS REGULATIONS 1999 | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c74822 _d74822 |
||