| 000 | 00944cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X128899 | ||
| 008 | 050225n2005 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u128899 | ||
| 100 | _aMurdoch, S. | ||
| 245 | _aGoing into remission | ||
| 260 | _c2005 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0506) 12 February 2005, 139(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the case, "St George's Investment Co v Gemini Consulting Ltd" ([2004] EWHC 2353 (Ch), Abs68658), which illustrates what the courts consider as an unacceptable approach by an arbitrator. The case also serves to summarise the effect of recent case law in this area. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aARBITRATION ACT 1996 | ||
| 650 | _aST GEORGE'S INVESTMENT CO V GEMINI CONSULTING LTD | ||
| 650 | _aCHECKPOINT LTD V STRATHCLYDE PENSION FUND | ||
| 650 | _aWARBOROUGH INVESTMENTS LTD V ROBINSON AND SONS (HOLDINGS) LTD | ||
| 650 | _aEVIDENCE | ||
| 690 |
_aDispute resolution _96236 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c74849 _d74849 |
||