| 000 | 01557cam a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS68749 | ||
| 008 | 050303n2005 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u128924 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aRiverside Property Investments Ltd v Blackhawk Automotive | ||
| 260 | _c2005 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[2005] 01 EG 94 (CS) |
||
| 520 | _a[2004] EWHC 3052 (TCC) 8 December 2004. Considered if would have been impossible to bring a roof up to the standard required by covenant for repairs other than by its complete replacement. The dispute centered on whether the state of the roof of a light industrial unit at the end of the lease was in breach of the covenant, despite the fact that B had made repairs to the roof and replaced damaged cement sheeting and all roof lights and fixings. R sought to recover costs from B on the grounds that only the replacement of the whole roof would have complied with the covenant. "Held": the claim was allowed in part; repairing the roof was a viable option but R was entitled to claim certain costs and expenses with regards to the preparation of a schedule of dilapidations and the enforcement of the repairing covenants. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aRIVERSIDE PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LTD V BLACKHAWK AUTOMOTIVE | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY DILAPIDATIONS | ||
| 856 |
_uhttps://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2004/3052.html _zView the judgment at www.bailii.org... |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c74862 _d74862 |
||