| 000 | 01326cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS68841 | ||
| 008 | 050308n2005 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u128990 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aNCR Ltd v Riverland Portfolio Ltd no.1 | ||
| 260 | _c2005 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty, Planning and Compensation Reports _v[2005] 1 P&CR 3 (13) |
||
| 520 | _a[2004] EWHC 921 (Ch), 2 April 2004. Discusses whether payment of a reverse premium infringes a covenant prohibiting underletting unless at a suitable market rate rent. N had arranged a underlet including payment to the underlessee of a reverse premium. R argued that the underlet was in breach of the covenant, claiming that the premium lowered the actual amount paid as rent. "Held": the payment of a reverse premium was accepted as a way of satisfying headlease conditions. The clause did not expressly prohibit the granting of a reverse premium. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aA G SECURITIES V VAUGHAN | ||
| 650 | _aHOMEBASE LTD AND ANOTHER V ALLIED DUNBAR ASSURANCE PLC | ||
| 650 | _aSNOOK V LONDON AND WEST RIDING INVESTMENTS LTD | ||
| 650 | _aNCR LTD V RIVERLAND PORTFOLIO LTD NO 1 | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-BREACHING BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c74893 _d74893 |
||