000			01136cab a2200169 4500
001			ABS68861
008			050315n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u129051
245			_aPatel and others v Shah and others
260			_c2005
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2005] 08 EG 190 (CS)
520			_a[2005] EWCA Civ 157, 15 February 2005. The appellants (P) could not claim a beneficial interest in properties purchased jointly with the respondents (S) as they had not contributed to the shortfall between the rental income and the remortgage payments. The properties had been bought with the intention to sell them on at a profit but during the 1990s slump it had been decided to hold onto them. "Held": the appeal was dismissed. The judge accepted S's equitable defence of laches on the grounds that P had neglected to do what could have been done to assert their claim. View judgment at www.bailii.org.
590			_aABS
690			_aPROPERTY
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/157.html&query=shah+patel&method=all _zView judgment on the BAILII website...
942			_n0
999			_c74918 _d74918