000			01488cam a2200193 4500
001			ABS68843
008			050322n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u129135
041			_aeng
245			_aTalisman Property Co (UK) Limited v Norton Rose (a firm)
260			_c2005
520			_a[2005] EWHC 85 (Ch), 1 February 2005. Considers the liability of a landlord's agent for the loss of a chance of payment for dilapidations and repairs due to their actions.The defendant (N ) was found to be negligent for having served a notice under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s25 on the grounds of s30(f) of the Act, opposing the grant of a new tenancy, contrary to instructions. There had been some confusion as to who the tenant was that the notice was to be served on and N had served the notice to the wrong one. N argued that since L was the tenant throughout there was no loss suffered by its negligence as the notice it served on W was of no effect anyway. "Held": N's application to strike out the claim against for compensation was refused. The court did not have to identify who was the tenant but whether the T had a real prospect of succeeding.
590			_aABS
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S25
650			_aTALISMAN PROPERTY CO (UK) LTD V NORTON ROSE
690			_aPROPERTY-LEASEHOLD PROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-DILAPIDATIONS
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2005/85.html _zView the judgment at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c74968 _d74968